CLEP College Composition Modular Readiness Test

10 questions, balanced across the exam's topics. Answer each one, then submit for your practice readiness estimate and per-topic breakdown. This is a practice estimate — not a prediction or guarantee of your official exam result.

Question 1

Original fictional practice draft: Walking school routes (1) Families lack shared information about practical walking routes to school. (2) The parent group should map routes with crossing and sidewalk details. (3) Parents at a meeting identified several routes they already use. (4) Conditions differ by time of day and may change during construction. (5) Maps could include observation dates and a way to flag changes. (6) Meeting participants may not represent every neighborhood served by the school. Why does the writer include sentence 4?

To anticipate a reasonable practical objection that the following sentence addresses. To announce that the proposal has been withdrawn. To change the subject to an unrelated personal story. To prove that the earlier observation was fabricated.

Question 2

FICTIONAL PRACTICE SOURCES — authors, publications, and observations are invented. Source A: Theo Park, "Local Review: Meeting summaries," 2024, p. 20. Residents repeatedly asked staff which proposals had actually passed. Repeated questions do not show whether a summary would resolve every misunderstanding. Source B: Arun Moss, "Implementation Notes: Meeting summaries," 2024, p. 23. Summaries could omit qualifications that matter to contested decisions. Each summary could identify the decision and provide a direct link to the relevant record. Which paraphrase most accurately preserves Source A's relationship between evidence and uncertainty?

Park says the practical concern in Source B is impossible. Park reports an observation relevant to the proposal but identifies a reason to limit the inference. Park states that no evidence on the topic exists. Park proves that the proposal has succeeded in every community.

Question 3

Original fictional practice draft: Meeting summaries (1) Residents cannot attend every town meeting and struggle to follow decisions. (2) The council should publish concise meeting summaries linked to full records. (3) Residents repeatedly asked staff which proposals had actually passed. (4) Summaries could omit qualifications that matter to contested decisions. (5) Each summary could identify the decision and provide a direct link to the relevant record. (6) Repeated questions do not show whether a summary would resolve every misunderstanding. A writer adds, "These observations prove that the proposal will succeed in every setting." Which revision best fits the evidence?

The observations justify further investigation; repeated questions do not show whether a summary would resolve every misunderstanding. The observations show that every concern about the proposal is false. The observations are worthless because they do not answer every question. The observations prove success because no further testing is needed.

Question 4

Which version correctly joins these two independent clauses without adding a conjunction? "The doors opened" / "the audience entered quietly"

The doors opened; the audience entered quietly. Although the doors opened. The audience entered quietly. The doors opened, the audience entered quietly. The doors opened the audience entered quietly.

Question 5

Original fictional practice draft: Shared study rooms (1) Groups struggle to find a place to work without disturbing quiet readers. (2) The library should test a reservation system for group study rooms. (3) Desk staff recorded frequent disputes about whether a room had been claimed. (4) Reservations might leave rooms empty when groups do not arrive. (5) Unclaimed bookings could expire after a brief stated interval. (6) Dispute records do not measure actual room use across the whole day. Why does the writer include sentence 4?

To announce that the proposal has been withdrawn. To change the subject to an unrelated personal story. To anticipate a reasonable practical objection that the following sentence addresses. To prove that the earlier observation was fabricated.

Question 6

FICTIONAL PRACTICE SOURCES — authors, publications, and observations are invented. Source A: Lena Scott, "Local Review: Local history recordings," 2025, p. 26. A small public event produced several detailed accounts of earlier neighborhood changes. Memorable accounts are not automatically representative of the whole community. Source B: Luca West, "Implementation Notes: Local history recordings," 2025, p. 29. Memories can conflict and may contain factual errors. Recordings could be labeled as recollections and compared with other historical evidence. Use APA parenthetical form for a direct quotation from Source A: author, year, and page. Which parenthesis is correct?

(Scott, 2025, p. 26) (West, 2025, p. 29) (Scott, 2025) (Scott, p. 2025, 26)

Question 7

Original fictional practice draft: Historic building tours (1) Residents see a restored building but know little about its earlier uses. (2) The preservation group should offer short tours using documented sources. (3) Visitors at an open house asked about the building's changing occupants. (4) Tours might repeat appealing stories that lack reliable evidence. (5) Guides could distinguish documented facts from uncertain accounts. (6) Open-house interest may exceed ordinary demand. Which statement best preserves the draft's central recommendation without making its claim broader?

No change should be considered until every possible objection has disappeared. The proposal should become permanent immediately because its success is certain. The preservation group should offer short tours using documented sources. The main goal should be to prove that all critics are uninformed.

Question 8

Choose the verb that completes the sentence in standard written English: "The list of participants ___ improved since last year."

has have having to have

Question 9

Original fictional practice draft: Community translation review (1) Important local notices sometimes use awkward or unclear translated language. (2) The town should invite qualified reviewers to check high-priority translations. (3) Residents identified phrases whose intended meaning was difficult to infer. (4) Review could delay notices that need to be issued promptly. (5) A planned review process for recurring notices could reduce last-minute work. (6) A few unclear phrases do not measure overall translation quality. What is the draft's primary purpose?

To recommend a limited practical change while acknowledging reasons to evaluate it carefully. To describe a completed experiment that conclusively settled the debate. To provide a complete historical account of the topic. To prove that one observation establishes a universal law.

Question 10

FICTIONAL PRACTICE SOURCES — authors, publications, and observations are invented. Source A: Elena Brooks, "Local Review: Textbook reserve copies," 2024, p. 15. Librarians recorded repeated requests for the same introductory textbooks. Request counts do not reveal how many students eventually obtained books elsewhere. Source B: Ava Price, "Implementation Notes: Textbook reserve copies," 2024, p. 18. A few borrowers might occupy the copies for most available hours. Short checkout periods and a visible queue could distribute access more fairly. Which research question most directly extends these sources with evidence useful for a decision?

Which author has the more memorable surname? How would a limited trial affect unique borrowers and waiting time for a reserve copy? Why is every person who disagrees always wrong? What is the one best solution to every community problem?

Unanswered questions count as incorrect. Your answers are graded on the server; no answer key is sent to your browser.

← Back to the CLEP College Composition Modular page